Emily Andrew

Emily receives instructions on behalf of both the prosecution and defence in the Crown Court, Youth Court, and Magistrates’ Court. She has a reputation for being approachable, fair, and consistent. This allows her to build a rapport with both witnesses and defendants. Her calm, structured approach, allows her to give clear and realistic advice whilst remaining empathetic. 

In court, Emily has a reputation for being a persuasive, thoughtful advocate. Through her attention to detail and careful drafting, she has been described as compelling, reliable, and calm under pressure. 

Emily is on the CPS Crown Court General Crime Panel as a Grade 2 Advocate. She also accepts instructions for regulatory matters and has previously been instructed on cases involving the gambling commission and housing disputes. 

Notable Cases

Operation Eaglesview – Prosecuted sentence hearings in relation to the 2024 Violent Disorder in Staffordshire, stemming from the Stockport Murders.

R v DS (Defending) – Persuaded the Judge to impose a suspended sentence for a 24-year-old being sentenced for their 3rd relevant offence of possessing a bladed article. The Mandatory Minimum sentence was imposed.

R v TBM (Defending) – Successfully secured a Youth Rehabilitation Order for a 14-year-old convicted of rape of a child under 13

R v NP (Prosecuting) – Defendant convicted of possessing a viable firearm after 3-day trial including cell-site expert evidence. 

R v SW (Defending) – Successfully persuaded the Crown to offer no evidence on appeal from the Magistrates Court in relation to a domestic violence matter. 

R v SH (Defending) – Successful “exceptional hardship” argument in relation to a speeding offence, whereby SH was fleeing from domestic violence. The Court imposed an absolute discharge.

R v DB (Prosecuting) – Trial counsel for a false imprisonment trial involving three vulnerable witnesses, intermediary reports, and complex disclosure issues. The defendant pleaded guilty on day two. 

R v NB (Defending) – Successfully persuaded the Crown to offer no evidence in relation to a retired police inspector of good character charged under the Dangerous Dogs Act. After submission of an abuse of process skeleton argument, the Crown reviewed their position, and a formal not guilty verdict was entered.